


Could DUI Laws be one of the Vehicles to take away our Constitutional Protection?
Could DUI Laws be one of the Vehicles to take away our Constitutional Protection? Politicians are planning to put the U.S. under an International Marxist New World Order dictatorship by various means. MADD claims they want to get drunk drivers off the road. Can the law prevent accidents? Are the ne...
Could DUI Laws be one of the Vehicles to take away our Constitutional Protection?
Politicians are planning to put the U.S. under an International Marxist New World Order dictatorship by various means. MADD claims they want to get drunk drivers off the road. Can the law prevent accidents? Are the new harsher penalties a solution? Is that the real reason for the harsher laws? What is the real motive behind the creation of new stricter DUI laws? The first thing I noticed is DUI laws do not require the arresting cop to read you your Constitutional Miranda Rights. And when no accident or problem has been caused by the driver who has been pulled over, or was forced to go through a police road block, or was stopped for some other reason, or encountered a cop who got suspicious. The suspect can be arrested for a crime that has not been committed, simply on suspicion that he might cause an accident. This is like other people being arrested for murder and given the death penalty, simply because they had a gun or a rock or anything that could be interpreted as a deadly weapon in their vehicle.
For example, politicians have scared people into thinking that unless we crack down on drugs, we will have anarchy with criminals roaming the streets. So they made some laws that allow the authorities to seize the private property of any suspected drug ring or person. All they have to do is plant some drugs in a house or vehicle. Then the authorities can ignore their Constitutional Rights and confiscate the vehicles, bank accounts, and real estate of that group or person and sell it on their black market without a trial.
Let's see if you think this MADDness is justice, or lynch mob rule. Arnold Swartzanager is hurting for money to balance his budget, and please his sources of money for his election (which includes MADD who want to get revenge against all drinkers for the death of a relative), so he has decided to double the penalties for a first time DUI offender from 9 months to 18 months of weekly classes at each, and increase the fines from several hundred dollars, to a few thousand dollars. And also to force first time offenders to pay several hundred dollars to install a breathalyzer device (the breathalyzer companies pay for the election of these politicians who support them, a good investment in a bad economy) in the first time offender's car, so they cannot start them if they even used Listerine. They are testing it in some counties in California now. And they are considering installing cameras. And if you cannot pay for all this, they will put you in debtor's prison. More and more innocent people will be put in jail.
If MADD can get the breathalyzers, then they will get the cameras. Once they create this precedent, then cameras will become standard equipment in ALL vehicles, homes, businesses, public places. Then when Big Brother decides to crack down, he can listen to your conversation and watch anyone who utters key words tracked on the Internet by satellite anywhere they are as a Political Enemy, and you will be arrested as a Terrorist Suspect. The laws are in place for this very thing.
Dude, I love you.
Yeah, right. You are one sick individual. Why not get help for your drinking? My husband’s health was ruined and two innocent people lost their lives because of a drunk driver. How fair is that? Huh? You tell me. He was on his way to work, supporting his family, doing what every good person should do when his car was sucker punched by a drunk shit head. Two completely innocent people died that morning because of this freak, and my husband will now live for the rest of his life in constant pain. Fuck you. Fuck you very much.
"Driving" it’s not a Constitutional Right; driving it’s a privilege (like a favor) granted by state laws if you follow their rules.
There are so many things wrong with your argument. I’ll just address the biggest one. You have no Constitutional right to endanger the lives of others.
Horse feathers. I am for justice in all areas, but you sound like the very person that has caused the law makers to take a tougher stand. You don’t know anything about rights. No rights are absolute. The court system is there to determine what rights have been violated, according to the circumstances in any case. No you don’t have a right to drink and drive or any other stupid thing you think you may have a right to do when it involves the true right, a right to life and free from unnecessary harm caused by those that think they have all of these rights. Your rights can not and should not be an annoyance to those around you. Yes, some of these laws that you think are ridiculous can and does save lives. If one life is saved by these laws, that is a great thing. Your freedom is not worth one single life. Please get a grip.
Does it hurt to be this stupid?
If you would only kill yourself driving drunk, then I’d happily give you the keys. But you are not worth taking an innocent person’s life.
I hate effin alcoholics and their rationalizing. You want to drink yourself to death, fine. But don’t drive and then whine about it.