Skip to content

DUI Laws and Penalties

DUI Advice, Statistics and Defense

Is this considered a legal DUI arrest?

Posted by admin on February 22, 2010. 10 comments.

Late on a Friday evening I was at a 7/11 kwiki mart in MA. I bought 2 sandwiches, and a drink and was paying for the the purchase at the register when 3 police cruisers pulled up.


The officers entered the store and inquired if the the silver ford taurus outside was mine. I answered that it was. They ordered that I step outside the store immiediatly and take a field sobriety test. When I inquired why I was being taken outside, they answered that there was an eye witness account of my car driving the wrong way in a nearby highway.

I explained to them that it was not me and that I had not driven on that highway at all that day. My keys were in my pocket, my car was off, and legally parked. Regardless, they took me outside and demanded that I take the nine step turn field sobriety test. After that one test, and not requesting any others, they asked me to take a portable breathalizer, which I refused.

They arrested me on the charges of OUI and Driving to endanger. When I was brought to the booking station, I once again refused to take the brethalizer, which means an automatic 180 day suspension of my license. I spent the night in jail, and got my car out of tow the next day.

Is this legal? I was not observed driving by the officers, was not in or near my vehicle, was in a private establishment and was only given one field sobriety test.

I did hire a lawyer. Based on your experiences... what will be the result of my situation? Was this a legal arrest, did the police officer have probable cause?
In reponse to a few answers:

1) It was at night
2) It was not me who was driving the wrong way on the highway, of that I am certain.
3) I was advised by my friend who is a lawyer to never take a breathalyzer if you have had anything to drink in the past 6 hours, as a reading over .08 means an almost automatic conviction.
Making negative assumptions on my character or rude remarks like "get a bike" are unnapreciated.

Thank you to those law enforcemnt officers who are answering this question in an informative manner.

Filed under: DUI Arrest

Tags: 7 11 kwiki mart, assumptions, booking station, breathalyzer, brethalizer, eye witness account, few answers, field sobriety test, ford taurus, friday evening, nearby highway, police cruisers, police officer, portable breathalizer, private establishment, probable cause, rude remarks, sandwiches, silver ford, wrong way

Next post: If a roomate is on probation, what are the laws of searching the house? What can they search?

Previous post: What are the chances that i can get a secret security clearance, and be accepted to Warrant Officer school?

Facebook comments:

Comments

  1. Stupid Should Hurt says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    It depends on your specific state laws, but most states allow a DUI/DWI/OUI arrest based on probable cause alone; they don’t actually have to see you driving the car. An eye-witness report is probably enough to support the level of suspicion needed to make contact with you and start the investigation. The reason they allow this is to allow the police to make a DUI arrest after a crash. Obviously, if the car is crashed out, there is no way to actually see the driver operating the vehicle, but they were DUI and caused a crash. This also applies if the driver crashes the car and leaves the scene on foot.

    Now, the refusal is a separate issue. When you get your DL, you automatically give implied consent to any lawful breath/blood/urine test and a refusal is an administrative violation that will cause your license to be suspended. Most states have an appeal hearing to allow the DL office to determine if the arrest and subsequent request for breath test was proper for DL suspension purposes. Be clear, this is totally different than the criminal trial and legal requirements. The DL hearing officer is working off of the standard of probable cause alone, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt as is required in a trial. The hearing will only determine if the police officer had enough probable cause to justify the arrest and request for breath test.

    As far as the criminal charges go, it will depend on the specific details of the incident and how well the officer conducted the investigation. It will also depend on how good your lawyer is. I have gotten convictions on DUI/Hit & Run where I didn’t ever see the driver in the vehicle, and didn’t make contact for almost an hour after the crash. I did it because I did a solid and honest investigation that was not open to attack. All you can do there is allow the process to work its way through the system.

    With regards to the field sobriety evaluations and portable breath test. In all states I am familiar with, these field tests are only for the purpose of building probable cause and are you are not lawfully required to take them. The roadside breath test is included in this. You have the right to refuse them without criminal penalties. The evidentiary test after arrest is a different story. You are required by administrative regulation to take it or risk losing your license. You can’t be criminally penalized for an administrative violation (although some states, such as Florida have a criminal charge for multiple refusals, which has been unchallenged as of yet). This is supported by case law and Constitutional law. What happens during the roadside sobriety tests can usually be used in court, although some states have varying levels of tolerance for the roadside breath test results.

  2. trooper3316 says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    An officer does not have to see you drive. It certainly helps build a stronger case, but it is not required. Traffic accidents are a common example of the officer not seeing you drive, but they can still take enforcement action. There is a presumption you drove the car, because you had the keys, and someone had to move it there. The witness statement strengthens this presumption.

    As long as the officers had probable cause you were driving, they can investigate you for DUI. Even if it was not you, as long as their actions were reasonable, it is legal.

    As far as giving only one sobriety test, as soon as you refused the portable breath test, they had probable cause for arrest. Refusal to do field sobriety tests is evidence of intoxication.

  3. hevymetal60 says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    they arrested u beacuse u refused to take the brethalizer test yes that is legal u singed off to get ur licenst that an officer can search ur car or issue u a sobriety test
    u are in the wrong the officers comducted the situation perfectly legaly

  4. Can't Stop the Hussein Brack says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Yes. You were only given one test because you declined to take two other ones.

  5. adairnolan says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Just because a witness called in the situation, does not mean the police have to arrest you. they have to have some other proof than just an eye witness. If it was dark at night, you have a good argument and can say that they misidentified your car. You should have a slam dunk argument if it was at night. Also, if the eyewitness was driving the other way, you can say that they did not get a decent look at the vehicle, supposedly driving the wrong way on the road.

  6. Westward Wind says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Absolutely. You must have really bombed that first test for them to just forgo the rest and go straight to the Breathalyzer.

    And your refusal to take the Breathalyzer is proof enough that you were drinking and were afraid you would blow over the limit.

    So to sum it up: You’ve got a witness saying you were driving the wrong way… and a guy who failed one portion of the field sobriety test and refusing to take a breathalyzer.

    Looks pretty open and shut to me. Buy yourself a bicycle.

  7. Proud Mama of 4 says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Yes it is legal. If you weren’t drinking, you should have taken the breathalizer and saved yourself a lot of grief. I suspect you are guilty and you know it.

  8. Gil R says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Did the eye witness provide a license number? Mere description leaves a big hole in their charge. You’ll have your day in court. They can file charges but they have to prove them.

  9. Levi says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    Honestly, all of these so called "experts" aren’t going to do anything but provide you with their self proclaimed "expert" opinion. You hired an attorney so allow him to weed through the paperwork and see what exists.

  10. Connor N says:
    February 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm

    there is no legal sie of being arrested. As being arrested means you have bvroken the law.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Recent Posts

  • Do u think dui laws have gone to far and do u consider it a 'what if' crime?
  • what are dui laws – dui penalties or dui consequences?
  • What are the Las Vegas marijuana dui laws?
  • What is a good carinsiurancefor a DUI offender ?
  • friend got their 1st DUI in orange county need advice?
  • What are my chances of doing jail time for a 1st time DUI in Maryland?
  • Impact of DUI on Government Employment Background Check?
  • What is a good carinsiurancefor a DUI offender ?
  • Relevance of a DUI 15 years ago when applying for jobs?
  • I have 3 dui convictions in Oregon. the first two occurred when I was under 21, the 3rd five years later.?

Categories

  • California DUI
  • DUI Arrest
  • DUI Attorney
  • DUI Charges
  • DUI Checkpoints
  • DUI Conviction
  • DUI Info
  • DUI Laws
  • DUI Offense
  • DUI Penalties
  • DUI Process
  • Insurance DUI
  • Marijuana DUI
  • Misdemeanor DUI

Popular DUI Subjects

3 years alcohol amp attorney bac blood test breathalyzer brother car accident car insurance consequences conviction cop cops dmv driving under the influence drugs drunk driver drunk driving dui DUI Attorney dui attorneys dui charge DUI Conviction DUI Laws DUI Lawyer dui lawyers dwi felony first offense full coverage insurance insurance company jail time job law lawyer legal marijuana misdemeanor money police officer possession of marijuana probation quot
© 2012 DUI Laws and Penalties ∼ DUI Advice, Statistics and Defense.